Disruptive: Rewriting the rules of physics is now available!

Posted by Steven Bryant On January - 2 - 2016

I am thrilled to share that my new book, Disruptive: Rewriting the rules of physics, is available for pre–order at Barnes & Noble and at Amazon.com! Disruptive is a thought–provoking book, one that introduces a new unified model called Modern Mechanics, and explains where and why Einstein’s theory went wrong. It will fundamentally change our […]






Episode 23 – Introduction to Modern Classical Mechanics

Posted by Steven Bryant On July - 18 - 2011

Modern Classical Mechanics is a new, intuitive, model that yields better than 100 times the accuracy of the Einstein-Lorentz equations in several experiments including Michelson-Morley and Ives-Stillwell!  Because it distinguishes between Length and Wavelength, its theoretical explanations avoid non-intuitive concepts like time dilation, length contraction, and the twin paradox; each of which are required by […]






Episode 21 – The Failure of Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof

Posted by Steven Bryant On March - 21 - 2010

We have offered many mathematical and conceptual challenges to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. In Episode 21, we offer compelling evidence that Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof fails. Without this proof, Einstein cannot establish a relationship between Relativity and the constancy of the speed of light; a cornerstone characteristic of the theory. This Episode reexamines the key […]






Episode 20 – AAAS Conference Presentation – Averages, Rates, and Functions

Posted by Steven Bryant On August - 29 - 2009

“I live 20 miles per hour from the University.” Is that statement confusing?  It should be.  In Episode 20, we take a look at Rates and Functions, and discuss how they have been mistreated for the past century.  More importantly, we’ll take a look at how key concepts and mathematics can get confused if we […]






Episode 19 (Video) – The Meaning of Moving Systems Models (CICS and SRT)

Posted by Steven Bryant On June - 15 - 2009

Do you want to know what Time Dilation is and why Einstein needed it to make Relativity work? In Episode 19, we explain what things mean.   We’ll talk about the main concepts that are important for each moving system model – Newton, Lorentz, Einstein, and the CICS Model. After watching this episode, you should […]






Episode 18 (Video) – Part 2 – Comparative Analysis of Moving Systems Models

Posted by Steven Bryant On October - 6 - 2008

In Episode 18, I present Part 2 of a 2 part presentation delivered at the AAAS/NPA Conference held in April 2008 at the University of New Mexico.  This presentation compares and contrasts the models presented by Michelson-Morley, Lorentz, Einstein, and myself – clearly outlining the key assumptions behind each model.  In addition, I summarize the […]






The Michelson and Morley Experiment

Posted by Steven Bryant On February - 6 - 2006Comments Off on The Michelson and Morley Experiment

This link will take you to an online version of Michelson’s and Morley’s 1887 paper presenting the results of the Interferometer experiment. This copy is maintained at www.aip.org.

Einstein’s Book of Relativity

Posted by Steven Bryant On February - 6 - 2006Comments Off on Einstein’s Book of Relativity

This link will take you to an online version of Einstein’s Relativity book. This copy is maintained at www.bartleby.com.

The purpose of this book is to bring Relativity to a broader audience. While Einstein’s rigorous derivations are contained in his manuscripts, he does offer a simplified derivation of his transformation equations in Appendix 1.

Einstein’s 1905 Paper on Special Relativity

Posted by Steven Bryant On February - 6 - 2006Comments Off on Einstein’s 1905 Paper on Special Relativity

This link will take you away from this site to an online version of Einstein’s 1905 foundational manuscript defining Special Relativity. This copy is maintained at www.fourmilab.ch.

In Section 3 of this paper, Einstein creates his transformation equations.  The findings presenting at this site can be confirmed by reviewing his paper and derivation.