Disruptive: Rewriting the rules of physics is now available!

Posted by Steven Bryant On January - 2 - 2016

I am thrilled to share that my new book, Disruptive: Rewriting the rules of physics, is available for pre–order at Barnes & Noble and at Amazon.com! Disruptive is a thought–provoking book, one that introduces a new unified model called Modern Mechanics, and explains where and why Einstein’s theory went wrong. It will fundamentally change our […]






Episode 23 – Introduction to Modern Classical Mechanics

Posted by Steven Bryant On July - 18 - 2011

Modern Classical Mechanics is a new, intuitive, model that yields better than 100 times the accuracy of the Einstein-Lorentz equations in several experiments including Michelson-Morley and Ives-Stillwell!  Because it distinguishes between Length and Wavelength, its theoretical explanations avoid non-intuitive concepts like time dilation, length contraction, and the twin paradox; each of which are required by […]






Episode 21 – The Failure of Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof

Posted by Steven Bryant On March - 21 - 2010

We have offered many mathematical and conceptual challenges to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. In Episode 21, we offer compelling evidence that Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof fails. Without this proof, Einstein cannot establish a relationship between Relativity and the constancy of the speed of light; a cornerstone characteristic of the theory. This Episode reexamines the key […]






Episode 20 – AAAS Conference Presentation – Averages, Rates, and Functions

Posted by Steven Bryant On August - 29 - 2009

“I live 20 miles per hour from the University.” Is that statement confusing?  It should be.  In Episode 20, we take a look at Rates and Functions, and discuss how they have been mistreated for the past century.  More importantly, we’ll take a look at how key concepts and mathematics can get confused if we […]






Episode 19 (Video) – The Meaning of Moving Systems Models (CICS and SRT)

Posted by Steven Bryant On June - 15 - 2009

Do you want to know what Time Dilation is and why Einstein needed it to make Relativity work? In Episode 19, we explain what things mean.   We’ll talk about the main concepts that are important for each moving system model – Newton, Lorentz, Einstein, and the CICS Model. After watching this episode, you should […]






Episode 18 (Video) – Part 2 – Comparative Analysis of Moving Systems Models

Posted by Steven Bryant On October - 6 - 2008

In Episode 18, I present Part 2 of a 2 part presentation delivered at the AAAS/NPA Conference held in April 2008 at the University of New Mexico.  This presentation compares and contrasts the models presented by Michelson-Morley, Lorentz, Einstein, and myself – clearly outlining the key assumptions behind each model.  In addition, I summarize the […]






#1 New Release in Physics of Mechanics
#1 New Release in Relativity Physics

Can’t wait for your pre-order to arrive? Good news! You no longer have to wait. You can begin reading  DISRUPTIVE: Rewriting the rules of physics today. Head over to the DISRUPTIVE (The Book) page at StevenBBryant.com! Then click on the image of the book or follow the reading link beneath the cover image.

Thank you for your support and your help in sharing this exciting news!

Rankings as of January 9, 2016 at Amazon.com.

Disruptive: Rewriting the rules of physics is now available!

Posted by Steven Bryant On January - 2 - 2016ADD COMMENTS

I am thrilled to share that my new book, Disruptive: Rewriting the rules of physics, is available for pre–order at Barnes & Noble and at Amazon.com!

Disruptive is a thought–provoking book, one that introduces a new unified model called Modern Mechanics, and explains where and why Einstein’s theory went wrong. It will fundamentally change our understanding of physics, space, and time.

Please follow me at my new blog www.StevenBBryant.com an Facebook at Steven B. Bryant for more info!

Religion Masquerading as Science

Posted by Steven Bryant On September - 19 - 2015ADD COMMENTS

Here is an interesting article where a group of people essentially want to stone people who do not hold their belief.

This has happened before.  Once, there was a man named Galileo, who believed that the planets orbited the Sun, not the Earth.  His view ran counter to the prevailing view of the day, which was that the planets orbited the Earth.  Because he held a dissenting view, he was placed under house arrest until his death.  While we may think that being jailed for holding a different scientific opinion is a historical footnote, some modern people and groups hold the exact same mentality.

Today, if you talk about climate change, you may strike an extremely emotional chord with some. Groups that support climate change want to prosecute those who believe something else.  Belief, while extremely important in religion, is not scientific. The very notion that people want to prosecute those with differing points of view is dangerous. If any group – whether a supporter or a dissenter, cannot defend a position on scientific grounds and instead has to resort to punishment to advance their ideas, they cannot be called scientists.  They go by another name: zealots.

In Disruptive: Rewriting the Rules of Physics, I not only challenging Einstein’s theory of relativity, I show why it is wrong and where Einstein made specific mistakes.  There is no ambiguity or room for “interpretation.”  This book challenges the prevailing view. If left to the people who authored this letter,  I would face arrest, prosecution, and punishment.

Are ideas so frail that they cannot withstand challenge? Should theories be elevated to the point where they are unquestioned laws?

No. Scientific theories and interpretations of data must be able to withstand any challenge and question.  We must never stifle ideas, even those that we disagree with.

New physics book planned for Fall 2015 release

Posted by Steven Bryant On February - 22 - 2015ADD COMMENTS

I know I’ve been gone for a while.  But I’m back with very exciting news!

I’m currently writing a physics book where, I’m happy to share, I’ve turned the corner from “heavy writing” to “heavy editing”. I should have a solid draft complete in the next few months and will publish the book in the Fall. In preparation for the book’s release later this year, I’ve just launched a new Facebook page – Steven B. Bryant, which can be found at http://www.facebook.com/StevenBryantAuthor. I’m super excited and hope you’ll Like and Follow my new Facebook page where I’ll keep you updated on progress and activities.

The news is buzzing this week with claims that researchers at the CERN, one of the world’s leading research centers, conducted an experiment that “proved” Einstein wrong. They claim that they were able to make neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light. But the media is sensationalizing things just a bit because the researchers “deliberately do not attempt any theoretical or phenomenological interpretation of the results.” [See their paper].

I’m excited by this experiment because it supports the findings that there are subtle, but significant, theoretical and mathematical mistakes in Einstein’s theory.

Also exciting, is that this experiment might be used to differentiate Modern Classical Mechanics (which is conceptually consistent with this experimental) from Relativity theory (which appears to be conceptually inconsistent with this experiment).

Over the past few days, people have asked me to summarize what is wrong with Einstein’s theory. I can summarize it as follows:

  1. His proof that establishes Relativity fails, but since it is a “false positive”, we think that it passed. Specifically, he claims to have a sphere and doesn’t. (See Episode 22)
  2. He mixes up concepts. He believes he is discussing time, when in reality he is talking about length. (See Episode 23)
  3. He mistreats wavelength as if it were length. This is equivalent to looking at your speedometer and believing that the readings are odometer readings. (See Episode 20)

We must remember that Einstein’s equations produce good results in many cases. So, this experiment is important because it could become a distinguishing experiment. Theories that support this experiment will prevail, while those that do not will undergo major revision, or will need to be jettison.

I invite you to explore the site. If you’re new, I hope you explore the papers and videos. If you’re a returning visitor, welcome back!

Until next time, Be Well!
Steve

Episode 23 – Introduction to Modern Classical Mechanics

Posted by Steven Bryant On July - 18 - 2011Comments Off on Episode 23 – Introduction to Modern Classical Mechanics

Modern Classical Mechanics is a new, intuitive, model that yields better than 100 times the accuracy of the Einstein-Lorentz equations in several experiments including Michelson-Morley and Ives-Stillwell!  Because it distinguishes between Length and Wavelength, its theoretical explanations avoid non-intuitive concepts like time dilation, length contraction, and the twin paradox; each of which are required by Relativity theory.
Read the rest of this entry »

Explaining Why Relativity Requires the Twin Paradox

Posted by Steven Bryant On May - 20 - 2011ADD COMMENTS

Title

The Twin Paradox: Why it is Required by Relativity
(Click to download)

Summary

This paper reveals that when wavelength-based observations are evaluated using a length-based perspective, that evaluation must explain changes in length and time, which Einstein does using Length Contraction and Time Dilation. It further explains that when wavelength-based observations are evaluated using a wavelength-based perspective, there are no changes in length and time, and the resulting mathematical equations yield quantitatively better results.

Read the rest of this entry »

Episode 22 (Bonus Episode) – Conference Presentation: The Failure of the Einstein Spherical Wave Proof

Posted by Steven Bryant On June - 30 - 2010Comments Off on Episode 22 (Bonus Episode) – Conference Presentation: The Failure of the Einstein Spherical Wave Proof

Episode 22 is the Failure of Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof presentation that I delivered at the 17th Annual NPA Conference held at California State University, Long Beach on 23, June 2010.  It is essentially the “Director’s Cut” of Episode 21, and expands on that material.  It shows that Einstein’s Relativity Theory derivation fails because of the failure in the Spherical Wave Proof.  Specifically, this episode covers the following:

  • Explains why the Spherical Wave Proof is The Essential Proof that established Relativity Theory
  • Shows the failure of Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof as a failure to develop a second sphere
  • Identifies the belief that the proof passes as the result of a “False Positive”, or “Type I Error”
  • Discusses implications of the failure on terms like Length Contraction, Space-Time Curvature, and Time Dilation

Viewers who have watched Episode 21 will find much of the material familiar.

 

Download Podcast | Open Player in New Window

Download in Windows Media Format

The Failure of the Einstein-Lorentz Spherical Wave Proof

Posted by Steven Bryant On March - 23 - 2010ADD COMMENTS

Title

The Failure of the Einstein-Lorentz Spherical Wave Proof
(Click to download)

Summary

This paper reveals a subtle, yet extremely significant oversight in Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof. Once identified and corrected, it also shows that the proof fails, which means that Einstein cannot establish the relationship between the constancy of the speed of light and the principle of relativity.

Read the rest of this entry »

Episode 21 – The Failure of Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof

Posted by Steven Bryant On March - 21 - 2010Comments Off on Episode 21 – The Failure of Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof

We have offered many mathematical and conceptual challenges to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. In Episode 21, we offer compelling evidence that Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof fails. Without this proof, Einstein cannot establish a relationship between Relativity and the constancy of the speed of light; a cornerstone characteristic of the theory.

This Episode reexamines the key characteristics of a Sphere, and uses those characteristics to show why Einstein’s proof actually fails. The following specific points are covered in this video:

  • A look at Einstein’s Spherical Wave Proof
  • A look at the textual and mathematical requirements of a Sphere
  • Review of Einstein’s work to show that his equations do not satisfy the requirements

In addition to the video, a PDF version of the presentation is available for download.
Read the rest of this entry »